Parents, Children and Game age classifications

•February 28, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Ok, this stems as a result of this post on gizmodo, now I know that both myself and Chris have views on this, and someone might actually want to know them, so here they are.

Jon:

Personally I do wonder sometimes about game ratings and the level of interest they generate.  As a gamer I am well aware of ratings and the content that games can contain.  Games and Films are inherently different, with Films being a story following a character in various scenarios, but yet distanced from the viewer, whereas Games have the ability to draw the user into them, really giving you the experience of being there, part of the story.  With the improvements we continue to see in graphics and now the increased likelihood of more immersive ways of playing, like force-feedback/VR, this immersion will only increase.  When games are now so real, it’s hard to separate reality from virtual, and people are very different in their abilities to do this.  Children tend to be quite impressionable, and so it is risky for a child to be playing 18 rated games, since it’s more likely to impact on them.  I do find it interesting when people claim that children are now so accustomed to violence and things like that, so the games won’t really affect them.  Exposure to such things stems from a variety of causes, but I digress, the point is that I too have seen parents purchasing games for their children, simply because their child wants the game.  My parents were quite restrictive of my game buying, I remember wanting to get GTA 3 I think and I was under 18 at the time, and my parents refused to buy it, although I simply borrowed it from my brother.  Some of my recent purchases, like Gears of War 2 make my parents wonder about computer games, bearing in mind it’s graphically violent nature.  They however know that I’m good with knowing that it’s just a game, and that the visuals are there to make it look good.  I’ll be honest with you, If my child was 16 and wanted to play an 18 rated game I would have to consider it carefully, but of course chances are a friend of theirs would have it already so they may well already of played it, so the exposure has already occurred.

Do games impact on children and people? Yes, definitely, but to what extent is difficult to determine.  Like I say some people cannot separate real life from games, and that is where problems occur.  Changing the classification system will probably not help matters.  Game shops are pretty good when it comes to IDing people when buying games, but most of the time it’s parents that buy the games anyway.

Chris:

First off I’d like to offer my apologies on my apparent lack of reply before moving on.

Games ratings are a very difficult and very touchy subject to write about, as I’m sure you are all well aware of. Growing up, my father generally allowed us to play any games we liked, BUT, the more adult rated games were hidden away until he was around to supervise us whilst we played. He was always up for getting in on the action himself.

My personal belief is that games ratings are needed, to a degree in a society where adults know very little about the computer games that are being released, but we are now fast approaching that era where the gaming children are starting to become adults. They still game, although I’m pretty sure not to quite as much as they once did, so they have a better understanding of what games should be suitable for their children.

We currently live in a society where the adults who are trying to dictate the games ratings are doing so from a very ignorant and out of reach position, especially since I’m sure they never play the games themselves.

As for the impact that games have on young children, well… maybe the games available back when I was younger, the likes of Doom, and Zero Tolerance, aren’t quite as graphically demanding as our current games, but as a young child, your imagination certainly has a tendency of running wild.

In contradiction to perhaps my entire article, I too would struggle in justifying the purchase of games I deemed too adult for my child, but I certainly wouldn’t be following the games ratings. There are many sources available via magazines or internet articles which offer viable ways of reviewing games or even previewing screenshots.

So I’d have to say the only person who can deem what’s suitable for your child, is YOU. Ratings are rough guidelines, if you really want to know if a game is suitable play it. Research it. It doesn’t take a lot of work. A quick five to ten minutes on the internet is adequate enough to find out about most games.

Even hire out the game from the likes of Blockbuster. Have a sit down over a couple of days and play it through, either by yourself or with your child present so you can review the good and the bad of the game. If you decide its suitable, THEN go out and purchase the game.

Are game ratings needed? I’d say no. In the age we live in its easy enough to research any given subjects. Most new releases have trailers or especially with the likes of the Xbox 360 or Playstation 3, they allow you to download demo’s of new releases. What better way to try the game out.

Dodgy Dell Nvidia Driver?

•February 28, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Ok, I can’t pinpoint this precisely right now (simply no time), but I installed an updated graphics driver from Dell for my Nvidia 8600 card in my Vostro, only to find that it seems to be causing a few graphical glitches and problems with turning the screen off…  Now how can a company release a buggy driver? especially when they have such a rubbish release schedule as it is.  Who knows might be my laptop being shoddy, looks like I’m going to have to find a better driver from laptopvideo2go, nothing new there then.

For reference the one I downloaded is listed as:
Date: 8/1/09
Version: 179.24 V32, A12

Who knows, there is probably a set of driver conflicts going on in my system right now, why does it always happen when you really need to use a system without error? I swear computers have limited A.I. to cause headaches.

[Update: have installed the standard Nvidia drivers 179.48, from laptopvideo2go, didn’t modify the inf file, so I’m pretty sure it’s the same as from nvidia’s website (just laptopvideo2go compress the setup).  Anyway Nvidia’s website says to not use the driver if on a Dell Vostro notebook and to wait for Dell’s OEM driver.  I laughed at that statement, since I know it’ll never come.  I was pleasantly surprised to see the setup install the driver with no problems, the computer rebooted with no problems, and the driver so far seems to work fine, will obviously see how it is over the next few days.

Further Update: Ah, on further use the driver does not solve my problem.  It could well be another driver interfering, or could be something gone wrong somewhere.]

Sennheiser CX 500 in-ear headphone Review

•February 25, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Well, I don’t know much on the subject of headphones, and I’ve never owned a decent pair until now, so consider this more a post about in-ear headphones in general.

For a few years I have been meaning to buy a decent set of headphones, preferably in-ear for the isolation, sometimes you just want to block everything out.  Now I have no idea as to what is good and what is not, but I look around and listen to a few people, and I soon concluded that the majority from the high-street stores are not fantastic.  One thing to bear in mind here is that everyone has their own preferences, and price ranges, so always go by what you like.  In-ear headphones (IEMs) have advantages and disadvantages, with the biggest plus point being noise isolation and lower listening volumes.  The biggest con’s tend to be microphonics (which can be reduced) and poor soundstage.  Now I had, and still have a relatively poor grasp on these concepts.

Anyway, I spent a few days solidly researching IEMs using head-fi.org, which is fantastic, a great source of reviews and opinions.  They also have a good introductory guide to IEMs here.

I was debating prices and quality, and couldn’t really get a good determination of what to get.  Now I listen to mostly rock (heavier forms) but sometimes I listen to everything else too, so i want a balanced purpose headphone.  Well for true outstanding quality you of course can pay loads, but for those just starting out I would say stay under £50-60.  But exchange rates really do affect this.  I was looking into Sennheiser since I’d read some good reviews, with the CX300 being very cheap really, £15 on some places.  However the CX500s are the newer versions, so of course newer is better.  I also briefly considered the CX 95s, and would of gone for it if it wasn’t for the price tag of £60.  In hindsight I could of stretched to it, but being new to this whole thing I didn’t want to risk it.  So decided on the CX500s it was then a case of where to buy them.  Checking EBay and Amazon revealed a few interesting things, mostly price.  Amazon marketplace and EBay list CX500s in the £15 range, obviously I don’t trust that, but I also like saving my cash.  In this instance though I was determined to take no risks, there are many many many fake Sennheiser headphones floating around and I don’t want to waste my money.  So I went straight to Amazon direct, £42, fair enough, but at least I know they will be genuine.  Ordered Friday 20th Feb, super saver delivery (which I find is very good most of the time), came today Wednesday 25th Feb, fantastic.

I’m using the CX500s as we speak, yet to give them a burn in, which I will do shortly.  I like them very much, then again as I said, I know very little.  Oh be careful of the packaging, it’s damn hard to get through and it even fights back, my finger was a victim, but luckily didn’t bleed on my headphones, blasted packaging; now I know why someone said it was bombproof, it really is.

Package contents:

1 CX500 Headphone, Y-corded, with in-line volume control.
1 Case
1 Headphone winder
1 Shirt Clip
6 pairs of ear tips (3 pairs single-flange [S,M,L], 3 pairs double-flange [S,M,L]) (I think..??)

Am using the small single-flange ones right now, they fit nicely, but don’t block too much out and are quite comfortable.  My ear’s aren’t used to IEMs so that’ll take some time to wear off.  Might switch to double flange later.

[Update 25/02/09: just had a little google about burn in times, came across some information I obviously missed earlier, apparently the CX500 line is being discontinued (dunno how much truth to that there is though), so perhaps prices will fall.  Ah well, if I paid too much I don’t care, as long as my ones last me a few years, I will be happy]

[Update 27/02/09: Getting used the headphones being in my ear, and I am getting more and more impressed.  Ok they are a little bassy, but they do still need some serious burn in, only done burn in stuff for about 2 and half hours, along with about 7 hours of normal listening…, so much more to go from what i can gather.  Also make sure all your music is at decent bit rates, 128kbs music really doesn’t sound right on these headphones, you can just tell it’s lacking.  Luckily most of my music is already in 192kbs for the most part, which sounds fine.]

Microsoft’s last push to businesses: “get vista”

•February 12, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Right, I need to start this by linking to an article, which I read and then decided to comment on here.

Ok, here goes.  The article talks about how Microsoft would like companies to upgrade to Vista now, and then move to Windows 7.  Now then, how long do companies take to test a new OS… sometimes 2 years, meaning that some companies are still testing, while others obviously don’t feel the need to upgrade.  I love how Ballmer said, “If you deploy a four or five-year-old operating system today, most people will ask their boss why the heck they don’t have the stuff they have at home”.  This is not the case, I admit most people will not understand the issues that a corporate IT department faces with upgrading their systems, however people would rather work on something stable than something which is hit-and-miss.  Now I’m not a vista hater, quite the contrary, but I can see it causing many IT departments a lot of headaches, since it’s so picky and fickle on many systems.  Also currently it’s simply not worth it for a majority of companies, even if they have agreements with MS allowing cheap upgrade prices, they still have to deploy it which costs money itself.

Now not working in a corporate IT department I can’t say anything for certain, but it seems to me a majority have tested or are testing Vista and have gotten used to it’s workings and determined application compatibility, so they are probably used to Vista’s codebase, and well aware of how different it is to XP.  If they don’t deploy Vista they will test Windows 7 both as an upgrade to Vista and as an upgrade to XP, and they will determine their own routes.  We’re used to companies waiting a long time until they adopt an operating system, but it wouldn’t surprise me to see a few early adoptions of Windows 7 once it’s tested.  Many companies have great working setups on XP machines, and it’s not a case of age of an OS or age of a computer; it’s about how well your employees work on those systems, if they know how to use it and their applications work, then there is not a very high reason to upgrade, hence why some people still run windows 98 in some offices.  Software updates for applications are usually a more pressing factor and with regards to companies dropping software support on XP machines, I think that’s rubbish.  No software company would drop support on what is the most used computer platform, it just makes no sense; I mean they’ve supported XP and Vista so far for three years, no reason they can’t continue, especially if Vista and Windows 7 are so similar.  With regards to security let me just state something, those working in IT departments are very aware of how to secure a system against attacks, many deploy global system policies to reduce user access.  I know that many recent exploits are code exploits, worrying although it is, many were solvable by not running certain features on a system, some of which aren’t run on a workstation in a corporation anyway.

Many corporations will of already decided on their upgrade strategies, and these are always carried out over a period of time.  I would love to know how many IT department staff have been complained at for not using Vista??

Microsoft Versus the EU

•February 11, 2009 • 1 Comment

Microsoft is the world’s worst monopoliser or so the stories which have been going about lead you to believe.
As I’m sure many of you have read in one place or another, the EU has been pursuing a case against Microsoft for antitrust violations which was first brought to their attention by Opera, a web browser which holds a mild level of success although Mozilla, the company behind Firefox, has also recently sided with the EU.

The violation in question I happened to misinterpret on my first read of the articles. The issue isn’t really about Microsoft’s Internet Explorer; it’s more a complaint against their operating systems and how deep they’ve tied Internet Explorer into them. I’m sure many of you out there, who don’t use IE as your default browser, have stumbled across various websites which fail to load or operate as intended due to not being open in Internet Explorer. A prime example being how Windows Live Messenger’s mail inbox would only open within IE and no other browser- a hassle for non-IE users which has only just recently been remedied.

I’ve read a couple of replies, from people who appear to have caught the wrong end of the argument, who state that Microsoft should just remove all browsers from their operating systems and allow people to choose one- but there lies the complication. Without a browser to begin with, how does one acquire a browser?

Others chimed in stating that P2P software and magazine CD’s are prime examples of a work around. Surely though it would be silly to implement things in such a way. For one, there are enough complaints about people using Peer-2-peer software, without Microsoft installing such software on all of their devices and by including them on magazine CD’s, well, surely that’s the same as charging people to buy their first web browser

Linux of course has an ideal work around what with having an update manager which requires no browser to begin with but I surely digress for the article in question is about none of these things. The complaint against Microsoft is to allow the end user to uninstall Internet Explorer without causing their operating system to become unstable. To include Internet Explorer if they so choose, but not to be tied to it as a web browser.

We shall see how things develop, but surely the removal of Internet Explorers’ deep hooks into its operating system can be nothing but a well welcomed and refreshing development.

Playing videos on Sony Walkmans

•February 10, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Now if you are one of those people who chose a Sony Walkman over any Apple based products, then you may understand the frustration that comes with them.

The sound is crystal clear and it’s extremely simple transferring music from your computer to your Walkman; now if only the same were true when it comes to putting your favourite videos onto your Walkman.

Now before I go on any further, I personally purchased a Sony NWZ-S639FR and to my delight was overjoyed on its usability and the functions available until I ran into the issue with getting my videos to play.

Having spent the good part of an evening researching into where I was going wrong, I found that the Sony Walkmans actually don’t have a great deal of compatibility when it comes to their video files.

Now first off, if you want to grab anything off of the BBC iPlayer (for those of you who reside in the UK) then you’re in for a pleasant surprise on how easy the process is. You simply have to download the video ‘For Portable Device’ which can be found on each page that contains a video file.

The only hitch I found being that once the file has been downloaded to your computer, you have to open it in Windows Media Player 11 before moving it to your Walkman. This is solely so it can download the media rights although I have yet to test whether or not you can use an earlier version of Windows Media Player.

Things to make note of

The first thing you will need to know before you get started is that the Sony Walkmans only support two video codec’s. Those being H.264/AVC (although also keep in mind you have a maximum bit rate restriction of 768k/sec), and MPEG-4 (which keep in mind you have the maximum bit rate of 2500k/sec.)

The second thing to be aware of is the fact that your maximum frame rate is 30fps and your maximum resolution is 320×240.

Last but not least the third thing to keep an eye on is that your video files must not exceed 2 GB in file size.

Converting your videos

Knowing all those things is all well and good, but there is still a hindrance. Where on earth would you find your favourite videos in that file format. Now not being a lover of Apple, I’m not completely sure as to whether or not they provide a way for users to receive such videos, so the only other method is converting the video files oneself.

There are a fair few pieces of software available to you out there, although I came to notice the majority are ones you have to pay for. One would assume if you were to look hard enough you would be able to find some decent free software which could do the job, and in actual fact I found one such piece of software.

The software in question is called “Any Video Converter” (Consequently you can visit their website if you click on the name) and having converted a few files I found it to be both simple and very quick in comparison to a couple of pieces of software I trial tested which require payment.

Any Video Converter

If you happened to decide to use Any Video Converter, then read on for a guide on how to convert your files. This guide does assume you are running Windows XP and have already downloaded and installed the piece of software so if you have yet to install it, please do so now.

1/Having opened the software, the first thing you will want to confirm is what profile you have it set to. The one you’re after is “Customized MP4 Movie (*.MP4)”. It won’t be the option by default, so please choose it from the dropdown list which should appear upon pressing on the arrow next to the text box.

2/You will want to add a video file now so if you look in the top left hand corner, you should see a button called “Add Video”. Upon selection a box should appear prompting you to select the file you wish to convert. Navigate to the file in question and press “open” which should be within the same window.

3/The file you selected should now appear in the window in the middle of the screen with the categories ‘Name’ ‘Duration’ and so on above. Left click once on the file and you should see its properties in the lower right hand corner.

4/Within the properties window in the lower right hand corner, under “Video Options” confirm that the ‘Video Codec’ selected is ‘mpeg4′ and that the video size is set to no higher than 320×240. Also before moving on, confirm that the bitrate is no higher than 2500k/sec and that the fps is no higher than 30 although do make sure to confirm they’re also not too low as it seems to standardise are quite low rates. If you’re not sure what to set them too, just run the same video file through conversion a couple of times using different settings until you find one you’re happy with. I found just setting it to 2500k/sec and 30 fps worked fine although the output would depend on the quality of the source file. The ‘Audio Bitrate’ may also need tweaking, but again, it can only output as good as the source.

5/Once these settings have all been checked and confirmed, select the “Convert” button which can be found next to the “Add Video” button. This will start the conversion, although this stage does take a little while to complete. Remember that the bigger the file, the longer the wait.

6/ Once “Completed” appears in the ‘Status’ Column you know the conversion has finished. The next stage is to right click on the file name and select “Open Destination File Location” and there you have it, your converted file.

7/ To move it to your Walkman, you’ll want to select the “Walkman” icon from your ‘My Computer’ and progress through the folder structure until you reach the videos folder. The address should appear as something like “My Computer\WALKMAN\Storage Media\VIDEO”

8/Just simply either drag and drop the file into your Video folder, or copy and paste it into there, either way should suffice.

Having done all that your new video should run perfectly on your Sony Walkman.

Favourite Firefox Plugins

•February 5, 2009 • Leave a Comment

I just realised that being big firefox fans we should have a post with our favourite firefox addons and why you should have them.  So here it is, divided up by blogger so you get a different opinion as well as a large number of plugins.

Jon’s recommendations:
Well my first recommended add-on would be

  • NoScript, definitely a must have for all firefox users.  However a word of warning it’s a bit of a pain since it blocks all scripts on a page by default, but I like that, I know that all that runs are scripts I trust and know.  It also blocks loads of ads too so it’s a win-win.  Some people don’t like the functionality that it blocks, but that’s because they don’t know how to use it.  If it blocks something you want then unblock that website by clicking on the noscript icon.  SIMPLE.

My next favourite addons would b:

  • Foxmarks Bookmark Syncroniser, great for syncronising your firefox bookmarks between machines.  Install the plugin on all your firefox browsers, and set up an account for foxmarks.  Then save the settings to each firefox browser, and sorted, foxmarks will help you sync all your bookmarks up to start with, then keep them up to date whenever it changes, plus now it can also do the same with passwords.  Very handy.
  • OpenDownload, I like the run functionality of IE, and now I have it in firefox too, only its a little more flexable too.

Well that’s some of my picks, I will probably add a few more later.

Site adjustments

•February 1, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Just a heads up I’m moving a few pages to posts, and going to get round to cleaning up this site.  So if you go to view something and it’s not there anymore, search for it using the search box, and hopefully you will find it.

Also, expect an increased post frequency (It will probably not happen, but I can only wish)

New Broadband plans for the UK

•January 31, 2009 • Leave a Comment

The government have set about creating a full report and plan for improving digital communications in the UK.  It encompasses everything from Mobile networks and Broadband, to dealing with illegal file sharing.  So quite a lot then.  Now we only have the interim report so far, however it looks promising as it appears to be trying to push up broadband speeds.  The minimum currently set is 256kbps, which is rubbish, but by 2012 this will be made 2mbps, but the key thing will be that EVERYONE in the UK will have at least those speeds.  Of course to meet this the line providers (pretty much just BT) will have to fully improve their networks to allow those speeds to be achieved.  This should have a knock on improvement to the speeds others get.  It’s well worth reading into this if you want to find out more.  You can find some information here and here (both BBC news articles).

Of course, we will see what really happens, but at least it’s a step in the right direction.

Installing a Windows 64-bit OS on a system with a Windows 32-bit OS

•January 31, 2009 • 1 Comment

Yeah the title is a bit rubbish but it sort of makes sense.  (This post talks mostly about Vista, however doing this on XP is not too dissimilar I reckon.)

Anyway, this applies to people with computers (PCs or Laptops) with a Windows operating system preinstalled, and with an OEM sticker on their system with a product key.

NOTE:  THIS COULD INVALIDATE YOUR WARRANTY OR LEAVE YOU TOTALLY UNSUPPORTED BY YOUR MANUFACTURER

You can always check with them though (although I bet they won’t understand what you are going to do).  Oh and you should check with them anyway to see if they can provide you with any discs and such to help you out.

When reinstalling an OS with the OEM product key you will encounter a problem activating it, because it’s an OEM key activated by the manufacturer.  Recovery CD’s and certain prebuilt Windows OEM discs will automatically resolve this issue when they install.

Right, onto the topic at hand.  You have a 32-bit windows OS and you want to install a 64-bit OS instead.  Things you will need if installing a 64-bit version of Vista:

1) A 64-bit version of Windows Vista on DVD (retail versions work best for this).  Or a Vista Anytime upgrade DVD (this needs to be 64-bit).

2) A program called ABR (available from here, you want the .EXE file as I had trouble with the .ZIP one)

3) A USB Memory key.

4) The original discs you got with your system.  Driver CDs, Windows Disc or Recovery Disc [In case this all goes wrong]

5) A backup of your data.

If you have all these then you can begin.  Now I’ll be honest there are other guides out there for this, so feel free to hunt around.

This is a good read before we start (or you can follow those instructions)

The differences between that guide and what you are going to do are small, rather than reinstalling your 32-bit OS, you will be installing a 64-bit OS.

With regards to 64-bit installation discs, they are not the easiest things to obtain, especially since you have an OEM version from a manufacturer.  I will not say how to obtain it since they are technically a sketchy area, however obtain one as you see fit.  Personally I feel that you paid for the OS with your system, so whether you have a 32-bit or 64-bit version is irrelevant, they are one and the same, so you getting hold of a 64-bit disc via piracy for example, doesn’t make it wrong. [NOTE: THIS IS MY OPINION.  I am not saying piracy is a good thing, it’s just that both versions of windows Vista 32-bit or 64-bit cost the same, so why should you have to pay again when you already paid once? It’s not like you haven’t got the license which is what you really pay for.]

Step 1: IF YOU HAVEN’T ALREADY then backup anything you want to keep.  Also it is a good idea at this time to note down the names and manufacturers of your system devices using device manager (e.g. sound device, GFX card, chipset [if you can find it otherwise don't worry I’ll cover it later])  Screen dump the device manager window if possible, and put the image on your USB stick, this will help later.

Step 2: download and extract the ABR program.  Then copy it in a folder to your USB memory key.  Now from the memory key run “activation_backup.exe”, which will produce two files within that folder.

  • backup-cert.xrm-ms: Backed up activation
  • backup-key.txt: Backed-up product key

now unplug your USB key.

Step 3: Here is where you will install Windows Vista 64-bit.  Put the Vista 64-bit disc in your computer, then restart.  You may have to push a key to get a boot device selection screen, or it may boot from DVD automatically although you will be prompted to boot from the disc.  The Vista setup is pretty straightforward, however a few things to note!

i) Do not enter a product key.  Untick the activate box.  Confirm that you do not want to enter a product key.

ii) If it asks you to select a windows version then select the one you have (when I carried this out on a system, I wasn’t asked this question)

iii) You have to choose custom (advanced) installation.

Now is a good time to repartition the drive, since many manufacturers partition them for no good reason (it harms disc performance).  NOTE: partitions on a disc vary, so be sure you know what you are deleting.  Sometimes there is a small unknown partition (or maybe even 2) one is EISA (I think) KEEP IT, since it’s either a recovery partition or diagnostic partition (I don’t agree with recovery partitions), if you are sure it’s just a recovery partition then you can remove it, otherwise leave it be.  You will probably then have either 1 large partition or 2 partitions of good size (depending on whether you had a C drive or a C and D drive in Windows.  [I’ve made this sound more complex than it is so sorry for that].

Basically you want just one large partition (or 1 large partition with the recovery partition if you keep it).  You need to format the large partition before use.

iv) Install windows to the large partition.

Step 4: When installed Windows vista will boot, now the first thing to do is to restore your activation information.  Plug your USB key back into the system, navigate to the folder with ABR in.  Run “activation_restore.exe”.  When complete restart.

Step 5: When in Windows again right click on computer (in the start menu) and click properties.  Now, it should say ‘System type: 64-bit Operating System’ and under Windows activation ‘Windows is activated’ and a product ID.

Step 6: Perhaps the most annoying step.  Installing drivers and system software.  If you have a system driver disc that is a good starting point.  You may have to look through it manually for the 64-bit drivers, or it may handle them automatically, try it and see.  If you have no luck, then go online to your manufacturers website and look for 64-bit drivers for your system.  That should help you no end.  If you are unlucky and cannot get them from your system manufacturer then you need to obtain them from the device manufacturer, which is sometimes not possible.

If hunting for drivers manually

Firstly let’s deal with the chipset, now if you know it then it’s not too hard, but if you don’t then use CPU-Z to find out (here) and it’s under mainboard chipset.  Take that information to the chipset manufacturer’s website and obtain generic drivers from them.  Graphics Chip/Card drivers are done in the same way, if you are not sure what you have then hunt though your system manufacturers site for information on your system.

Most other device drivers can be found in similar ways.

Now, I hope that covers everything.  If not do leave a comment and I’ll adjust this as required.  Now I have carried this out on a friend’s system, a Samsung laptop.  That was not a 100% success, since Samsung don’t have any 64-bit drivers, nor will they anytime soon it would seem.  However core functionality is working, and the system is fine, just certain hotkeys and fuctions are not available, I’ll probably fix that sometime soon though.  I have no reason to upgrade my current system (my Vostro) to 64-bit since I only have 2Gb of RAM although you may want to check here for a little rant about the 32-bit/64-bit thing here, which stemmed from me working on my friends laptop.